“The policy reduced emissions by 30%.”
Specific figure / needs a primary source
Back to FeaturesCheck the claim.
Verify a Claim
Check the claim.
Keep the uncertainty.
AimiVerify breaks a statement into checkable parts, looks for supporting and conflicting evidence, and shows how much the evidence can actually carry.
ClaimsSeparated first
EvidenceCompared in context
LimitsMade explicit
◇ Extracting claims
◈ Searching evidence
◆ Bayesian analysis
● Computing belief
Before checking an answer,
make it checkable.
AimiVerify separates a broad statement into the individual claims inside it. That prevents one persuasive sentence from hiding several different questions.
Submitted statement
The new policy reduced emissions by 30% and was a major success.
Evidence is stronger
when it can disagree.
Primary record
The original emissions inventory establishes what was measured and when.
AimiVerify looks for evidence that supports a claim and evidence that complicates it. A disagreement is information—not an error to hide.
A verdict is a map, not a stampSee what the evidence
See what the evidence
can—and cannot—say.
AimiVerify does not turn every question into true or false. It explains the balance of support, conflict, and unresolved uncertainty behind the conclusion.
Current readingSupported
The available evidence points in the same direction, with no material conflict found.
More honest than
a green checkmark.
- 01Evidence, not certainty
A strong result means the current evidence supports the claim. It does not mean the question is permanently closed.
- 02Context, not just citations
A source is useful when it is relevant, timely, and independent—not merely because it exists.
- 03A clear next question
When evidence is mixed, the useful output is often the missing fact that would change the conclusion.